WELCOME to the Messageboard for the Boston Science Fiction Film Festival and Marathon!!
What was shown in 2024: THE MATRIX in 35mm! ONE MILLION YEARS BC in 35mm! LAPSIS, READY PLAYER ONE in 70mm! DREDD, MAD MAX, PREDESTINATION, TOP OF THE FOOD CHAIN (aka INVASION), UPGRADE, ATTACK OF THE CRAB MONSTERS, DEEP BLUE SEA in 35mm! and BLAST FROM THE PAST. Plus! A bonus surprise! And, of course, Duck Dodgers! More to come
SF MARATHON INFO LINKS
SF/49 Official Information Page Click here
Reactions to 2024's SF/49 lineup? POST here
>List of ALL Films that have played the Marathon. Click below
Click here for The History Of The Marathon/Festival

The Next Marathon will be held Presidents' Day Weekend 2025 at the Somerville Theater.
It will be preceded by the Boston Science Fiction Film Festival. For ticket info: www.Bostonsci-fi.com


  Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
   
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
 
KONG IV: SKULL ISLAND (Read 2396 times)
Mar 30th, 2017 at 7:24pm

L.A. Connection   Offline
YaBB Administrator
SF Rocks

Gender: male
Posts: 1771
*****
 
The fourth major attempt to tell the King's origin story. It's certainly the most action-packed. But, it's a movie of massive contradictions. At times genuinely amusing and even a bit witty, and at others, full of cliched and downright silly tropes. There are some terrifically composed shots and scenes - but, also many WTF? angles and visuals (Really? Do we need a super-tight closeup of a soldier's face drinking out of a canteen? Is this a TV show or a 'Major Motion Picture'?). The SFX are very good with a decent use of proportion. The cast is better than the material, even if it continues to show Hollywood's bankruptcy in having yet another Best Actress winner (Brie Larson) use her "talents" to play 'the girl' in a blockbuster (hey, at least it's a big paycheck, right?). I know, I know, it's just a "big dumb B movie". But, for a reported budget of $200M (plus marketing), I expect a little more than out of it than a 60s Toho tyke-fest.

But, in the end it's a fairly forgettable affair without much heart (sorry, a two-minute scene of Brie touching Kong's face doesn't amount to much empathy after we've seen a bunch of soldiers and primitive creatures stomped, eaten and torn limb from limb for 100 minutes). On that score, I'll take Peter Jackson's flick, Jack Black and all. But, hey, it's better than the '76 Dino Kong.


Mild SPOILER:



Has there ever been another case where the End Credits gave away a Spoiler? As the end credits roll we see a credit that Toho owns the rights to Godzilla, Ghidrah, Mothra etc. And, that's BEFORE they actually show them in the After Credits tag scene!
 
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Apr 1st, 2017 at 11:09pm

Jay Seaver   Offline
Senior Member
Somerville, MA

Gender: male
Posts: 255
****
 
I don't think lack of heart is necessarily it's problem; John C. Reilly probably gives it more than most monster movies of its type manage even while being the comic relief, and while what Samuel L. Jackson is doing isn't "heart" in the traditional sense, the decision to go the Heart of Darkness/Apocalypse Now route rather than the go for the traditional pulp-adventure atmosphere is a good one and Jackson makes it work.  I kind of admire it not going the traditional route in that way; I don't think you're going to beat Jackson's for that sort of "heart".

(And, yeah, I'd put Peter Jackson's as the best in that category; the expanded runtime and historical perspective give Naomi Watts and Jack Black the chance to do more with their characters than the originators could.)

The knowledge that this is going to be part of some Legendary kaijuverse makes it a weird one for me to approach.  I enjoyed it a great deal - the effects and action are great, better than most monster-battle movies at showing massive power, evenly-matched fights, and humans actually managing to be a non-trivial part of the action - and the characters grew on me enough that I was actually a little disappointed to realize that they likely wouldn't be able to show up in the inevitable Godzilla vs King Kong movie because of the 40-year gap, and the waste that represented for the franchise dinged it a bit for me.  Unfair, in some ways,but not in others, if we recognize this as a part of a whole and judge it based on its contribution to that whole.
 
IP Logged